health care reform

To me, the best thing the federal government can do is stop trying to create jobs
     — Congresswoman Nan Hayworth

I am new to the district but I can’t for the life of me see why those who support Nan Hayworth seem mesmerized by her statement that government cannot create jobs. If anyone knows anything about history, they know that it was World War II that ended the depression and launched our nation onto a 25 year period of rapid growth and increased incomes for people up and down the income distribution.

The private sector created lots of jobs after 1945 because the government (at all levels) spent a lot of money on roads, schools, hospitals, research, military equipment—even two wars one in Korea and one in Vietnam. Rising levels of government spending made it possible for businesses to be profitable because that government spending put lots of income into the hands of lots of people.

Today, business investment in equipment has been pretty healthy since the bottom of the recession—but that represents 7% of GDP. To get consumers spending, we need to get people back to work.

In her first major vote this week, Congresswoman Nan Hayworth will join with national Republican leaders to remove essential health care benefits and cancel consumer protections to individuals and families in the Hudson Valley. Neither the Congresswoman nor her friends in the national Republican party believe that this vote will result in the actual repeal of health care reform, so we ask the simple question: why is Congresswoman Hayworth putting politics above creating jobs in our district?

This political stunt aside - if enacted, the consequences of Congresswoman Hayworth’s first major vote couldn’t be more serious for our families. Indeed, if Congresswoman Hayworth and the insurance companies win this fight to rollback protections for patients, insurance companies would gain even stronger control over health care.

Repeal of health care reform would allow insurance companies to discriminate against Americans—even children—with pre-existing conditions, and more easily rescind policies once insured individuals become sick. Protections for women against “gender rating”, which results in women either being denied insurance or having to pay higher premiums, would be thrown out. In some instances, pregnancy could even be deemed a pre-existing condition. Young adults would no longer be able to obtain coverage on their parent’s plans after they finish college and seniors would lose expanded prescription drug coverage. Insurance premiums would increase at an even faster pace than they are now.

It is important that we let Congresswoman Hayworth know that she was elected to address the problems of the Hudson Valley, not waste her vote and taxpayer resources on political stunts. In a time when jobs should be the number one concern of our elected officials, Congresswoman Hayworth is choosing to make her very first vote a wasted one that will lead to nowhere.

Nan Hayworth is upset about the new health care law. After all, it might cut into her husband's profits at his enormous Mt. Kisco Medical group. What better reason could there be to advocate repeal of a law that would make healthcare available to millions in the middle class and prevent people with pre-existing conditions from being denied access to health insurance?

And she now has a partner in crime - the "beloved" former governor, George Pataki.

by Flo Greenwood

While John Hall stayed home in his district last night, donating his time and talents to save the Beacon Theater, Nan Hayworth was living the high life out of State, partying at her fundraiser thrown by Hedge Fund Kings Steven Shapiro and Charlie Parkhurst in tony Greenwich, CT.

The two Republican candidates vying to challenge Congressmember John Hall have both decried his vote in favor of health care reform. Hayworth says that it will hurt our economy, Ball says it will replace the insurance lobby with government bureaucrats.

This year about 58 constituents of the NY 19th will die because they have no health insurance.